Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (UNEP-WCMC and IUCN, accessed 2021); www.protectedplanet.net
Venter, O. et al. Bias in the location of protected areas and its effects on the long-term aspirations of biodiversity conventions. Conserv. Biol. 32127-134 (2018).
Google Scholar
Ward, M. et al. Only ten percent of the global network of terrestrial protected areas is structurally connected via intact land. Nat. Common. 114563 (2020).
Google Scholar
Adams, WM Against extinction: the story of conservation (Earthscan, 2004).
Watson, JEM Dudley, Segan, N. & Hockings, DB The performance and potential of protected areas. Nature 51567-73 (2014).
Google Scholar
Butchart, SHM et al. Gaps and solutions to achieve national and global conservation area goals. Conserv. Lett. 8329–337 (2015).
Google Scholar
Stolton, S. et al. The future of private protected areas (IUCN, 2014).
Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (UNEP-WCMC and IUCN, accessed November 2018); www.protectedplanet.net
Bingham, H. et al. Private Protected Areas: Advances and Challenges in Guidance, Policy and Documentation. Parks 2313–28 (2017).
Google Scholar
Gallo, J., Pasquini, L., Reyers, B. & Cowling, RM The role of private conservation areas in representing biodiversity and achieving targets in the Little Karoo region, South Africa. Biol. Conserv. 142446–454 (2009).
Google Scholar
Schutz, J. Creation of an integrated network of protected areas in Chile: a GIS assessment of the representation of ecoregions and the role of private protected areas. About. Conserv. 45269-277 (2018).
Google Scholar
Ielyzaveta, IM & Cook, CN The role of private protected areas in achieving representation of biodiversity within a national network of protected areas. Conserv. Science. Practice. 2e307 (2020).
Google Scholar
Graves, RA, Williamson, MA, Belote, RT & Brandt, JS Quantification of the contribution of conservation easements to the conservation of large landscapes. Biol. Conserv. 23283–96 (2019).
Google Scholar
De Vos, A. & Cumming, GS The contribution of land diversity to the spatial resilience of protected area networks. People Nat. 1331–346 (2019).
Google Scholar
Olson, DM et al. Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World: A New Map of Life on Earth: A new global map of terrestrial ecoregions provides an innovative tool for biodiversity conservation. Bioscience 51933–938 (2001).
Google Scholar
Myers, N., Mittermeier, RA, Mittermeier, CG, Da Fonseca, GAB & Kent, J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403853–858 (2000).
Google Scholar
Borrini-Feyerabend, G. et al. Governance of protected areas: from understanding to action (IUCN, 2013).
Lee, A. & Schultz, KA Comparing British and French Colonial Legacies: An Analysis of Cameroon’s Discontinuity. QJ Polit. Science. 7365–410 (2012).
Google Scholar
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. & Robinson, JA The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation. A m. Econ. Tower. 911369-1401 (2001).
Google Scholar
De Vos, A., Clements, HS, Biggs, D. & Cumming, GS The dynamics of privately proclaimed protected areas in South Africa over 83 years. Conserv. Lett. 12e12644 (2019).
Google Scholar
Conservation programs (USDA, accessed 21 October 2021); https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/natural-resources-environment/conservation-programs/
Zimmer, HC, Mavromihalis, J., Turner, VB, Moxham, C. & Liu, C. Native Grasslands in the PlainsTender Incentive Program: Conservation Value, Management, and Monitoring. Rangel. J 32205-214 (2010).
Google Scholar
A global standard for identifying key biodiversity areas (IUCN, 2021); https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/Rep-2016-005.pdf
Venter, O. et al. Last of the Wild Project, version 3 (LWP-3): Human Footprint 2009, version 2018 (SEDAC, 2021); https://doi.org/10.7927/H46T0JQ4
Hoekstra, JM, Boucher, TM, Ricketts, TH & Roberts, C. Coping with a biome crisis: global disparities in habitat loss and protection. School. Lett. 823–29 (2005).
Google Scholar
Newbold, T. et al. Has land use pushed terrestrial biodiversity beyond planetary boundaries? An overall assessment. Science 353288-291 (2016).
Google Scholar
Bengtsson, J. et al. Grasslands – more important for ecosystem services than you might think. Ecosphere tene02582 (2019).
Google Scholar
Working together for the grasslands. How ranchers and WWF are helping protect the northern Great Plains (WWF, 2021); https://www.worldwildlife.org/stories/working-together-for-grasslands
Henderson, KA et al. Landowners’ perceptions of the value of natural forest and natural grasslands in a mosaic ecosystem of southern Brazil. To support. Science. 11321–330 (2016).
Google Scholar
Kamal, S., Grodzinska-Jurczak, M. & Brown, G. Conservation on private land: a review of global strategies with a proposed classification system. J. About. Plan. Managed. 58576-597 (2015).
Google Scholar
Williamson, MA, Schwartz, MW & Lubell, MN Spatially Explicit Analytical Models for Socio-Ecological Systems. Bioscience 68885–895 (2018).
Google Scholar
Watson, JEM et al. Persistent disparities between recent rates of habitat conversion and protection and implications for future global conservation goals. Conserv. Lett. 9413–421 (2016).
Google Scholar
Di Marco, M. et al. Quantify the relative irreplaceability of Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas. Conserv. Biol. 30392–402 (2015).
Google Scholar
Jones, KR et al. A third of the world’s protected lands are under intense human pressure. Science 360788–791 (2018).
Google Scholar
Sanderson, EW et al. The Human Footprint and Nature’s Last: The Human Footprint is a global map of human influence on the earth’s surface, suggesting that human beings are nature’s custodians, whether we like it or not. Bioscience 52891–904 (2002).
Google Scholar
Clements, HS, Kerley, GIH, Cumming, GS, De Vos, A. & Cook, CN Private protected areas provide key opportunities for regional persistence of large and medium-sized mammals. J.Appl. School. 56537–546 (2018).
Google Scholar
Song, P., Kim, G., Mayer, A., He, R. & Tian, G. Assessment of ecosystem services of various types of urban green spaces based on i-Tree Eco. Durability 121630 (2020).
Google Scholar
Trzyna, T. Urban Protected Areas: Profiles and Best Practice Guidelines (IUCN, 2014).
Li, E. et al. (2019) An urban biodiversity assessment framework that combines an urban habitat classification system and citizen science data. Front. School. Evol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00277 (2019).
Venter, O. et al. Global Human Footprint Maps for 1993 and 2009. Science. Data 3160067 (2016).
Google Scholar
Rissman, AR & Merenlender, AM The Contributions to Conservation of Conservation Easements: Analysis of the San Francisco Bay Area Conservation Lands Spatial Database. School. Soc. 1325 (2008).
Google Scholar
Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020, including Aichi Biodiversity Targets (CBD, 2011); https://www.cbd.int/sp/
Saura, S., Bastin, L., Battistella, L., Mandrici, A. & Dubois, G. Protected areas in ecoregions of the world: how connected are they? School. indic. 76144-158 (2017).
Google Scholar
Global Database of Key Biodiversity Areas (BirdLife International, accessed September 2020); http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/site/requestgis
Saura, S. & Torné, J. Conefor Sensinode 2.2: A software package for quantifying the importance of habitat patches for landscape connectivity. About. Model. Software 24135–139 (2009).
Google Scholar
Core team R. R: a language and an environment for statistical computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2014). http://www.R-Project.org/
Milam, A. et al. in Protected areas: do they safeguard biodiversity? (eds Joppa, L. et al.) 81–101 (Wiley-Blackwell, 2016).
Mason, C. et al. Telemetry reveals that existing marine protected areas are worse than random at protecting foraging habitat for threatened shy albatrosses. Divers. Dist. 241744–1755 (2018).
Google Scholar
Lewis, E. et al. Dynamics of the global domain of protected areas since 2004. Conserv. Biol. 33570-579 (2017).
Google Scholar
Venter, O. et al. Sixteen years of change in the global terrestrial human footprint and its implications for biodiversity conservation. Nat. Common. 712558 (2016).
Google Scholar
Schleicher, J., Peres, CA, Amano, T., Llactayo, W. & Leader-Williams, N. Conservation performance of different conservation governance regimes in the Peruvian Amazon. Nature 7113-118 (2017).
Google Scholar
Shumba, T. et al. Effectiveness of private land conservation areas in maintaining natural land cover and biodiversity integrity. Global. School. Conserv. 22e00935 (2020).
Google Scholar
